Prompt-level gaps

Prompt-level gaps evidence type

Prompt-level gaps show where one specific prompt exposes a weakness.

The gap might be a missing mention, weak framing, competitor advantage, source issue, or content need.

Inspection surface

Inspect the prompt result first, then check related sources, competitors, and historical runs.

This keeps the gap tied to evidence.

Prompt gap

A prompt-level gap should stay tied to the answer, sources, competitors, and run history.

Most prompt-level gaps make more sense when linked to sources and competitors.

If a competitor wins because of a source, the action may be source review or content work. If the prompt is bad, the action may be prompt cleanup.

CLEA follow-up

Ask CLEA to classify the gap before creating work.

workflow.txtCopy prompt
Classify this prompt-level gap.
Options: prompt cleanup, competitor review, source opportunity, content gap, no action.
Return one recommended next step and the evidence behind it.

Next step

Main website