When not to automate

Some work should not be automated.

Stop when the evidence is weak, the data is missing, the claim is risky, or the next action is unclear.

Use a human reviewer when the workflow touches public claims, competitor comparisons, legal language, pricing, customer results, or publishing.

If CLEA cannot prove a claim, it should not write it as fact.

It can say what proof is missing. It can suggest where the proof should go. It should not pretend the proof exists.

CLEA is strongest when it inspects evidence and drafts next steps.

It is weaker when it is asked to make final business decisions without review.

When automation should stop, turn the result into a question.

Do not create a card yet.
Show me what evidence is missing and what a human should decide before this becomes work.