Suggestion-card outputs
Workflows can create actionable cards
Suggestion cards are one of the most useful workflow outputs.
They turn dashboard evidence into one visible next step. This is important because the user should not need to read every chart before knowing what to do.
Issue found
The workflow should identify one issue.
Examples include a weak prompt, a source gap, a competitor gap, a missing page proof section, or a Search Console page that deserves review.
Evidence attached
The card should be based on evidence.
That evidence can come from Analytics, Sources, Competitors, AI readiness, Search Console, Google Analytics, or a workspace file.
CTA written
The CTA should be short and direct.
Examples: `Review source gap`, `Improve page proof`, `Open prompt evidence`, `Create page brief`.
Suggestion output
A workflow should create one useful card or no card, not a long list of weak tasks.
Card quality after automation
A card is useful when the user understands the action in a few seconds.
If the title is vague, the card is weak. If the description does not explain why the action matters, the card is weak. If the CTA points nowhere useful, the card is weak.
Human review before trust
Even automated cards need review.
Before acting, check the evidence and ask whether the next step is truly clear.
Feedback from accepted cards
Accepted cards teach which workflows are useful.
If a weekly workflow keeps creating good cards, keep it. If the cards are ignored or archived, rewrite the workflow or lower the schedule.